Chapter 7 Mcgraw Hill Pertinent Questions Answers

Relevant Questions Chapter 7 31. How did the Embargo influence the appointment of 1808, and what was the reaction of the new president to political issues that the Embargo had tended to? The Embargo made a downturn on the country and gave traders the feeling that Jefferson was acting illegally. In this manner, in the appointment of 1808, the Federalists ran more grounded than previously. Despite the fact that the Republicans won the administration, Madison comprehended that the Embargo was a political risk and in the long run expelled it. Rather, he passed the Non-Intercourse Act, which told Britain and France that if both of them were to disregard the United State’s rights as a nonpartisan nation, they would promptly contradict that nation until they concurred. 33. What was Tecumseh's mentality toward the bargains recently haggled between the United States and different Indian clans? How could he intend to forestall the extension of white settlements? Tecumseh accepted that the dealings were all void since the land had a place with the entirety of the clans. He felt that all together for the United States to really pick up the land, they would need to counsel the entirety of the clans. Tecumseh realized that so as to keep the Americans from extending, the Indian chiefs would need to join their motivation. 35. For what reason did Americans need to wrest control of Florida from the Spanish? What endeavors were made to do this before 1812? Which endeavors were fruitful, and which fizzled? The South needed to deal with Florida so as to increase significant ports. Florida likewise went through streams, making it appropriate for transportation and agribusiness. In 1810, a few pioneers got the stronghold at Baton Rouge. Madison added the domain and afterward intended to acquire Floridian land. The endeavor to acquire land from Florida was ineffective until some other time in time. 40. For what reason did New England contradict the War of 1812? Preceding 1814, what did the New England states do to upset the war exertion? The Federalist for the most part involved New England, however the gathering was reducing. They restricted the war in light of the fact that increasing new land would build the Republican Party’s power. Their restriction brought about any expectations of severance and even the Hartford Convention. Now and again, Federalists even observed British triumphs. 41. What made the pioneers of New England see the War of 1812 as a danger to their future as an important power in the United States? What did they propose to cure this circumstance? On the off chance that the Republicans won the War of 1812, they would then extend their nation, demonstrating their capacity in the situation of the administration. The Federalists, presently a decreasing force, feared their misfortune in the power of government, accordingly arranging the Hartford Convention. The show served to ‘protest’ against the Republican’s picking up of intensity and examined the privilege of invalidation and even alluded to severance. Nonetheless, it was without any result. 42. What impact did the Hartford Convention host on the Federalist Gathering? The Convention united the Federalist Party in sharing thoughts. Their arrangements to conflict with the Republican Party and their requests were arranged in the Hartford Convention. The ineffectiveness of the war nearly improved the Federalists’ chances at power. Be that as it may, when the news happened to Jackson’s triumph, their arrangements at the show appeared to be vain, indicating the annihilation of the Federalist Party. 43. What was the foundation to harmony dealings at Ghent? What did the two sides at first interest, and for what reason did they at last concede to the terms they did? The two sides were drained from the war and surrendered their past solid requests. The United States, understanding that Britain had little motivation to meddle with the trade in light of Napoleon’s rout, didn't push Britain to surrender impressments or Canada domain. England, depleted and in the red from the wars, didn't push to have an Indian cushion state in the Northwest Territory. Dealings were feeble and hurriedly drawn up.

How Marriage Works

â€Å"Marriage is the procedure by which two individuals make their relationship open, authorities and permanent† as per PsychologyToday. Marriage permits your relationship to be perceived by the administration. Individuals can wed for various reasons, including religion, monetary advantages, or for adoration and friendship. The social check has changed in America, with more individuals wedding later in their life. There are numerous reasons why individuals are choosing to push marriage off. Marriage can be both valuable and negative.Marriage can give better monetary steadiness to the two accomplices. At the point when you wed, you can get a conjugal duty reasoning. This permits you to move resources for your companion without being burdened for it. You are likewise ready to acquire your life partner's advantages including government disability and medical coverage. Prenuptials are a safe method to keep your benefits in marriage. By having a prenuptial, individuals can keep their unique resources regardless of if there is a part or separation. Hitched couples are commonly more monetarily steady, with â€Å"the middle family pay of wedded families is twice stifler of separated from families and multiple times that of esperares households† as per the site Marripedia.Married individuals likewise have emotional well-being and organic advantages. For instance, wedded individuals commonly live more: â€Å"Research reliably shows that couples in a submitted marriage live longer that those that are single† said Ivy Jacobson, writer of the article â€Å"13 Legal Benefits of Marriage.† Because the two individuals feel steady help from their accomplices, mental security is improved, permitting the couple to live more and abatement the possibility of sorrow. Psychological well-being is critical in the strength of the relationship. By containing feelings and considerations, it can adversely affect your confidence and increment stress. By having an accomplice, you are permitted to open up and feel heard, diminishing that pressure and improving the manner in which you take a gander at yourself. Marriage builds serotonin levels. Serotonin is a compound and synapse in the human body and is â€Å"sometimes called the upbeat substance since it adds to prosperity and happiness† expressed James McIntosh in his article â€Å"What is Serotonin and What Does It Do?† Having a noteworthy other to give physical warmth and enthusiastic help triggers the arrival of serotonin, making an inspirational mentality. Marriage can likewise bring about separation and money related solidness. As indicated by the site DivorceStatistics, â€Å"current separate from insights in America is assessed to be fifty percent.† It is anticipated that the separation rate will proceed at this equivalent rate later on, making your opportunity of an enduring marriage impossible. Just as a possibility that your marriage will come up short, a separation is over the top expensive. A separation with kid care and bolster issues cost around 26 thousand dollars. A separation without kid guardianship and backing is around 17 thousand dollars. These amazingly significant expenses can leave the two sides of the gathering in major financial trouble. There is likewise a likelihood that you could be wedding into a money related weight. On the off chance that one individual acquires obligation, the life partner will convey that obligation also. â€Å"Researchers investigated the relationship of 4500 couples and discovered contentions about cash were the top indicator of divorce† says Nancy Durham, creator of â€Å"Should You Tie the Knot? Budgetary Reasons Why Marriage Might Be A Misstep.† As a wedded couple, you should design your future monetary circumstances and have the option to set aside cash productively. Negative emotional well-being qualities can likewise emerge from marriage. One mate may turn out to be excessively sincerely reliant on their accomplices, causing pressure and strain between the two. That companion may begin to feel just as they need their accomplice to be glad, and can turn out to be excessively genuinely dependent on them. Just as one accomplice being excessively genuinely contributed, psychological well-being issue don't help. Negative enthusiastic responses brought about by disarranges can get heightened. Accomplices that can't get the help and help they need from their accomplices frequently resort to substance misuse and seclusion. As indicated by Pierre Imlay, a psychological well-being specialist, in his article â€Å"Mental Illness in Couple Relationships,† â€Å"when the conjugal pressure is at its top, there's a more noteworthy probability of substance abuse, development toward separation, and male aggression.† Marriage can be seen in both a positive and negative way. Marriage can be extremely valuable to couples that have imparted to one another about their desires for the relationship and marriage, their future, financial circumstance, and their psychological well-being. In the event that there is a significant difference, you might need to reexamine about getting hitched and weigh out the professionals or cons, or probably you may simply wind up being another measurement for separate. In spite of the fact that marriage has numerous parts that ought to be examined in advance, it eventually is a wonderful thing that ought to be shared and paid attention to.

myStatus Page Down - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

myStatus Page Down - UGA Undergraduate Admissions myStatus Page Down In preparation for First Year decisions, the myStatus page will be temporarily closed. This will affect the status check for First Year and Transfer applicants. We must do this to allow our office to begin the final stages of the decision process. We will still be making transfer decisions during this time and letters will continue to be mailed Please bear with us as we move forward with decisions. We do not have a date for the release of First Year decisions. Once that is available, we will post an update. myStatus Page Down - UGA Undergraduate Admissions myStatus Page Down In preparation for the Freshmen decisions that will be sent out in late March, the myStatus page will be temporarily closed to allow our office to begin the final stages of the decision process. We will still be making transfer decisions during this time, and these applicants will still be notified by mail. Please bear with us as we move forward with decisions, and when I have a date of the release of freshmen decisions, I will post it here.

The Range of Statistical Data Sets

In statistics and mathematics, the range is the difference between the maximum and minimum values of a data set and serve as one of two important features of a data set. The formula for a range is the maximum value minus the minimum value in the dataset, which provides statisticians with a better understanding of how varied the data set is. Two important features of a data set include the center of the data and the spread of the data, and the center can be ​measured in a number of ways: the most popular of these are the mean, median, mode, and midrange, but in a similar fashion, there are different ways to calculate how spread out the data set is and the easiest and crudest measure of spread is called the range. The calculation of the range is very straightforward. All we need to do is find the difference between the largest data value in our set and the smallest data value. Stated succinctly we have the following formula: Range Maximum Value–Minimum Value. For example, the data set 4,6,10, 15, 18 has a maximum of 18, a minimum of 4 and a range of 18-4 14. Limitations of Range The range is a very crude measurement of the spread of data because it is extremely sensitive to outliers, and as a result, there are certain limitations to the utility of a true range of a data set to statisticians because a single data value can greatly affect the value of the range. For example, consider the set of data 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 8. The maximum value is 8, the minimum is 1 and the range is 7. Then consider the same set of data, only with the value 100 included. The range now becomes 100-1 99 wherein the addition of a single extra data point greatly affected the value of the range. The standard deviation is another measure of spread that is less susceptible to outliers, but the drawback is that the calculation of the standard deviation is much more complicated. The range also tells us nothing about the internal features of our data set. For example, we consider the data set 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 10 where the range for this data set is 10-1 9.  If we then compare this to the data set of 1, 1, 1, 2, 9, 9, 9, 10. Here the range is, yet again, nine, however, for this second set and unlike the first set, the data is clustered around the minimum and maximum. Other statistics, such as the first and third quartile, would need to be used to detect some of this internal structure. Applications of Range The range is a good way to get a very basic understanding of how spread out numbers in the data set really are because it is easy to calculate as it only requires a basic arithmetic operation, but there are also a few other applications of the range of a data set in statistics. The range can also be used to estimate another measure of spread, the standard deviation. Rather than go through a fairly complicated formula to find the standard deviation, we can instead use what is called the range rule. The range is fundamental in this calculation. The range also occurs in a boxplot, or box and whiskers plot. The maximum and minimum values are both graphed at the end of the whiskers of the graph and the total length of the whiskers and box is equal to the range.

Reasons For Women s Great Leaders Essay - 1962 Words

17 Reasons women make Great leaders. 1. They value work - life balance. Women are great leaders because they are to balance professional and personal leadership skills. It’s easier to approach a women leader with a personal request , or a sensitive question. Women a more proactive in becoming mentors , and sometimes it’s already such an open and communicative relationship that the relationship that the transition to mentor is easy . 2. They are empathetic . Most women are naturally empathetic and value relationships. This enables them to have a strong understanding of what drives and motivates people, and how to acknowledge different people for their performance. 3. They make great listeners. Women make great leaders because they take the time to listen of reacting right away. They appreciate people and their viewpoints. Whether they are right or wrong ,we hear them out and then make our decision. We tend to give people chances that no others do. 4. They are nurturing. One of the key aspects of leadership is the ability to help your team members develop their own skills and strengths. Women are naturally nurturing , which in the best scenarios can translate to helping those around you succeed. 5. They focus on teamwork. Women consistently demonstrate passion enthusiasm and an immense capacity to serve and be served by others. Women make bold and wise decisions as leaders while relying on others to be part of their team. TheShow MoreRelatedWhat Makes A Leader Great? Essay1316 Words   |  6 PagesIt’s impossible to respect, value and admire great leadership if you can’t identify what makes a leader great. There are noticeable differences among the leaders, none may be as significant as the leadership styles of the men and women leading their respective organizations. Many researchers suggest that women leaders are natural leaders and women are more qualified for leadership positions while others suggest differently. I address my assertion that women possess more natural leadership than men.Read MoreThe Numbers Are Stark. Despite Women’S Impressive Gains1557 Words   |  7 Pagesthe past 50 years, men greatly outnumber women in leadership, especially in top positions. From corp orate boardrooms to the halls of Congress, from universities to the courts, from religious institutions to philanthropic organizations, men are simply much more likely than women to be leaders. This topic has captured the attention of the nation. Many thousands of books and articles offer theories about the nature of the problem and advice to individual women on how to stand up, step up, lean in, andRead MoreKing Alexander Lll : King Of The Western World1168 Words   |  5 Pageslll 2 King Alexander lll of Macedon was the best leader during his time, and he soon became the king of all western civilization, before he was 30 years old. Alexander accomplished greater things than not only of the kings who had lived before him, but also of those who came after him. Alexander lll of Macedon was born in Pella, Macedonia in 356 B.C. He spent his childhood years watching and learning how his father transformed Macedonia into a great military power. Alexander’s dad was King PhilipRead MoreThe True Definition Of Leadership Essay1641 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Leaders have been around since the beginning of man,† says the authors of ‘Introduction to Health Care Management.’ (Buchbinder, 2012) As a result, time has taught us the true definition of leadership. For years, the method by which a person has persuaded and motivated others to participate in accomplishing a goal has become monumental. The commitment that great leaders encompass are not defined with a simple definition of leadership. The mutual theme with great leadership is that success is notRead MoreWho Is Your Favorite Political Leader And Why?1382 Words   |  6 Pagespolitical leader and why? What are the qualities that make him/her a successful leader? What experiences and/or people in his/her life helped this person become an effective leader?† Throughout history it indicates that political leader must have the certain ability to lead his or her nation. There are so many political leaders who are well known throughout history such as Adolf Hitler, Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, and the list can go on. Even though each of these political leaders is from differentRead MoreWomens Status in Islam Essay940 Words   |  4 Pages In Islam, women and men are equal in terms of their relationship with Allah. It can be clearly seen that Allah has created men and women differently, this is so that they may fulfil different purposes in life. It is not a question of the superiority of one gender over another, rather it is a matter of role differentiation. Islam teaches that men and women complement one another and are both equally important. On the otherRead MoreA Common Source Of Conflict Essay1526 Words   |  7 Pagesdiscrimination Indian women face under religious personal laws. A Uniform Civil Code replaces patriarchal personal laws with a common set of laws that would govern each citizen and cover matters relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. While India is a democracy, Indian leaders recognize that there are several religious groups living within their borders so they strive to be a pluralist country, a country where there is more than just one center of power, which in India s case areRead MoreWhat I Really Like These Chapters?875 Words   |  4 Pagesencouraging and supporting women who are considering leadership roles, working on their individual leadership skills so that there are more qualified candidates or speaking up to the managers in charge when they feel like there is some kind of diversity of exclusion problem that has come to their attention. I have also learned that not only do the individual employees should put in an effort to change the general makeup of what a company leader is represented as. Women should be encourage to takeRead MoreCan Women Thrive Within A Male Dominated Society?1733 Words   |  7 PagesCan Women Thrive In A Male Dominated Society? Gender equality is not yet a reality. Not only is it not a reality, but it never will be, so long as the misogynistic views of old-time Americans stay prevalent. Hostility toward women in positions of high power remains present in society regardless of what women try to do to advance. Surely, it has been proven that women have accelerated far beyond what was expected of them a hundred years ago. However, women have been characterized as â€Å"overly-emotional†Read MoreThe Equal Pay Act Of The United States1033 Words   |  5 Pagesearly history in America women were deprived of some of the many rights given to the male citizens. It has almost been a century since women were awarded the right to vote in the United States. It’s been half a century after the Equal Pay Act was established. â€Å"The Equal Pay act led to a reduction in the wage gap, but wage differences based on sex persist† (Korgen Giraffe, 2015). Sadly, there is still a lot of prejudice towards w omen in the workplace. Bigotry towards women in the workplace has been

Caesars Gallic Wars Free Essays

string(117) " Carnutes stormed into the town of Cenabum and killed Roman merchants and a commissariat officer of Caesars as well\." Sanders Walker Dr. Bishop Western Civilization 103-104 11/20/12 Caesars Conquest Caesar is known as one of the greatest military leaders in history. His was General and later, Ruler of Rome during its peak years. We will write a custom essay sample on Caesars Gallic Wars or any similar topic only for you Order Now Caesar is known for his military strategy and conquest of much of ancient Europe. Where Caesar made a name for himself was his conquest of the Gauls. Caesars conquest of Gaul consisted of many campaigns throughout northern Europe; the most notable being the battles of Avaricum, Gergovia, and the final battle in Alesia. Caesar and Vercingetorix, the leader of the Gauls, were both similar in ambition. How does Caesar fair strategically against Vercingetorix and the Gauls at the battles of Avaricum, Gergovia and, Alesia? Caesars conquest of Gaul was indeed his most difficult one. Gaul consisted of dozens of tribes and much of the territory being Northern Europe had never been explored before by the Romans. A great amount of pressure was put on Caesar by himself to conquer Gaul. He was in deep political debt to Rome and its leaders, and he saw the conquest of Gaul to the best way to get out of debt and make a name for himself. Caesar making the first [1]Triumvirate with Crassus and Pompey gained the power of the election and became consul for the year 59 B. C. During this year he was made, â€Å"Governor of Illyricum, or Dalmatia, and of Gaul, that is to say of Gallia Cisalpina† (Pg. 40), this land is really known as a Province that Caesar acquired. Caesar having acquired these lands, but not officially having control, sought to conquer the inhabitants. Caesar is described as, â€Å"In person he was tall and slight, but well-knit; and, if he was as licentious as the mass of his contemporaries, his constitution, fortified by abstemious habits, was capable of sustaining prodigious efforts. His broad dome-like skull ; his calm and penetrating eyes ; his aquiline nose ; his massive yet finely moulded jaw, expressed, like no other human countenance, a rich and harmonious nature, aâ‚ ¬Ã¢â‚¬  intellect, passion, will moving in accord. And, if his vices were common, his generosity, his forbearance, his [2]equanimity, his magnanimity were his own. He believed, with an unwavering faith, that above himself there was a power, without whose aid the strongest judgement, the most diligent calculation might fail. That power was Fortune; and Caesar was assured that Fortune was ever on his side† (Pg. 41). Caesar was extremely ambitious and refused to be undermined by his enemies, this is probably why his conquest against overwhelming odds was so successful. As Caesar dealt with his issues in Rome, there was word that newly acquired provinces in Gaul were going to be marched on by the Helvetti. Caesar left Rome as soon as possible, cutting through the Alps to reach the province of Geneva (Cisalpine/Transalpine province). Caesar legions linked up with the legion of that province and destroyed the bridge or Rhine leading to Geneva. Helvetii sent requests to pass through, but Caesar denied them. Caesar waited out the requests as levies were created and simply denied the crossing of the Helvetii. Some tried to force themselves over, but failed miserably in doing so. Caesar crossed back gathering more legions for his command. Caesar dispersed his legions with Lieutenants into different regions of Gual, with his plan being to divide the already disbanded Gallic tribes. Caesar returned to Rome and received great praise for his victory over the Helvetii. Caesar marches back towards northern Europe in 58 B. C where Ariovistus and his massive hordes of Germanic soldiers, had become a threat to Caesars campaign against the Gauls outside the town of Vesontio. The legions lacking rest and supplies and fearing Ariovistus, was taking its toll on Caesars men. A panic amongst the legionnaires ensued; Caesar immediately puts to work his persona. Giving a riveting speech to the legions, he regained the confidence overwhelmingly. There only several miles separating Caesar and Ariovistus, but many Cavalry skirmishes took place as Caesar tried time and again to force the Germanics to fight. Ariovistus requested several meetings with Caesar, the first resulting in failure due to lack of compromises, and the second because Caesar never attended. Ariovistus refused to fight before the New Moon, Caesar finding this out attacked early forcing the Germans to fight. Caesar having command of the right wing of the legions, had planned on attacking the opposing Germans left wing which was supposedly their weak point. Ariovistus and the German horde fell upon the Roman legions quickly leaving huge gaps between the legions. This prevented the Roman javelins to be thrown. The Germans formed a, â€Å"[3]phalanxes† (Pg. 66), which was a wall of men inclosing themselves in a shielded wall. The Romans made quick dismemberment of this wall of shields as the Romans, â€Å"Dug their swords down into them† (Pg. 66), leading to the German left wing falling back. The left wing of the Roman legion however was beginning to give up ground. In command of the Caesars cavalry was Publius Crassus, the son of the famed triumvir Marcus Licinius Crassus. Publius Crassus led the 3rd line of the cavalry in and quickly rerouted the German onslaught on the Roman left wing. This led to the victory over Ariovistus and the Germanic army. With later victorious campaigns over Aquitani, Usipetes, Tencteri and Atuatuca from 56-54 B. C. Caesar believes Gaul is won and return to Rome to gain political power. While Caesar believed Gaul to be, â€Å"tranquillized† (Pg. 29), or rather under control as Caesar had planned to make all of Gaul a Roman province. The Gallic chieftains discussed in great detail of what was to become of Gaul if something was not done. A rumor quickly spread through Gaul in 52 B. C that Clodius had been murdered and violent riots broke out all over Gaul. The Gallic chieftains of Carnute made quick use of time while Caesar was still in R ome; a small group of Carnutes stormed into the town of Cenabum and killed Roman merchants and a commissariat officer of Caesars as well. You read "Caesars Gallic Wars" in category "Essay examples" In the Gallic town of Gergovia, a young Gallic noble came to power. His name was Vercingetorix and he quickly assumed dominance throughout Gaul. Vercingetorix was very impressionable and ambitious, much like Caesar. He soon united all Gaul sparking a massive rebellion in 52 B. C. Caesar observed Vercingetorix and saw that he was vastly becoming a huge threat. Roman provinces in peril began to fall due to lack of supplies, But Caesar moved swiftly from Rome to rescue the provinces. Caesar stopped the invasion of Narbo. Caesar still needed to regroup with his legions in the north. Caesars being the brilliant military leader he was, planned to march north through mountains of [4]Cevennes into the land of Vercingetorix, where the land Agedincum was. The journey was rough for Caesars men under the harsh conditions of winter, but to Caesars advantage, Vercingetorix did not realize where the Romans were or where they were going. As Romans came through the mountains, â€Å"Caesar’s horsemen swept over the country in small parties, carrying fire and sword† (Pg. 135), Caesar anticipated that Vercingetorix would come to Agedincums relieve, and he did so reluctantly while Caesar proceeded north to regroup with his legions. Once Caesar had gathered his legions he awaited Vercingetorix next move. Vercingetorix recovered from the Romans strategic maneuvering, decided to go south, opposite of Caesars position and siege Gorgobina an allies of Caesars provinces. Vercingetorix figured this, â€Å"To strike at Caesar’s allies would be equivalent to striking at Caesar himself† (Pg. 136). This indeed was true it was imperative that Caesar could not lose the trust of his allies, but Caesar also knew that pursuing hundreds of miles south without enough supplies would put his legions at risk of starvation. Caesar contemplated this and decided to relieve Gorgobina. Caesar instead of taking the same route he took to come north he went around in attempt for revenge for the massacre of Roman citizens. Caesar went about it, â€Å"More-over, by ravaging the lands of Carnutes and Bituriges, he might count on forcing Vercingetorix to relax his hold on Gorgobina† (Pg. 137). Caesar captured Vellaunodunum and approached Cenabum with rage as Romans set [5]Cenabum ablaze as supplies were given up to the legions while Caesar marched onwards to Avaricum. Vercingetorix believed the only way to weaken Caesars onslaught through his land was to burn and destroy any resources ahead of Caesar. The Gauls did not receive the news very optimistically. Burning down towns and crops was a harsh method of slowing down the Romans, but Vercingetorix got the Gauls to agree, with this speech he made, â€Å"They must make up their minds to sacrifice their own interest for the national weal. Every hamlet, every barn where the enemy could find provender must be burned to the ground. Even the towns must be destroyed, save those which were impregnable, lest they should tempt men who ought to be in the field to go to them for shelter, and lest the Romans plunder their stores† (Pg. 139). The Gauls still however thought to defend Avaricum rather than burn it to the ground. Avaricum was surrounded by walls and marshes and moats. Caesar made his encampment south of Avaricum several hundred yards out. Caesar realized the only way to siege Avaricum was to build siege towers and terraces. The marshes could not serve as proper platforms so, â€Å"in order to provide a secure foundation, the ground was cleared of obstructions and leveled as far as possible by men working inside stout huts† (Pg. 140). Wooden shields protected men relaying material through, â€Å"lines of sheds† (Pg. 40), as it was said to have taken several weeks to construct the towers. The effects of Vercingetorix burning of Gallic resources began to take its toll on Caesars legions. The Romans supplies began to dwindle and as Caesar sent men out to gather supplies and resources, Vercingetorix had patrols keep track of Caesars movements. Caesar was surrounded and while they waited to attack Av aricum, his men killed the cattle for food. Caesar did all he could to keep his legions spirits up, he would tell them, â€Å"He would abandon the siege† (Pg. 141), but the legionnaires were stubbornly loyal. A small attack was made on the towers, but only set the construction a day behind. The following day Caesar conducted his siege of Avaricum. The siege took no time at all with the Romans climbing the walls, they realized it was pointless to go down into the city, but rather, â€Å"They lined the wall round; and not a man of them would come down. Throwing away their weapons, the Gauls ran for their lives through the town to its furthest extremity; and there many jostling one another in the narrow gateways, were slaughtered, while others, who shouldered their way out were cut down by the cavalry† (Pg. 146). This was indeed a massacre by the Romans; no one was spared not man women or child. The Romans found a multitude of resources such as corn and other supplies. The Gauls were outraged by this massacre at [6]Avaricum. Caesar had hoped to break the Gallic pride with this victory, but it did quite the opposite. Vercingetorix following the massacre made a speech and a promise to Gaul. This speech gave Gaul a new found enragement and confidence. Caesar marched south to Gergovia, Vercingetorix homeland. Once Vercingetorix got word of Caesars movement he quickly destroyed all bridges along the river leaving only the bottom intact. As the Gauls caught up with Caesar, the Romans found it impossible to repair the bridges with the Gauls watching. Caesar was forced to come up with another diversion; under the cover of darkness he moved opposite of one of the bridges, and in the morning, â€Å"he took forty out of the sixty cohorts, composing his force; arrayed them in six divisions, so that seen from a distance, they would look like the six legions† (Pg. 149). With Caesar outwitting Vercingetorix, he moved south toward the mountain of Gergovia. As Caesar approached Gergovia a cavalry skirmish ensues, but the Gallic cavalry of Vercingetorix is forced back in the stronghold of Gergovia. Gergovia was going to prove to be another difficult siege due to its geography, â€Å"The town stood on an oblong plateau, which formed the summit, extending about seven furlongs from east to west, and six hundred yards wide† (Pg. 150). The town also had an outer wall as well, but the weak point appeared to be the southern wall. There were two large encampments in Gergovia, the smallest was on the southern wall, while the main encampment was on the steepest part of Gergovian wall. Caesar under the cover of night had several divsions move up the southern wall having Vercingetorix think that was where the main attack would be. Caesars full-scale attack actually occurred on the eastern or steepest side with Vercingetorix largest encampment was. The Gauls were caught off guard, â€Å"but the Romans deceived by their armour, took them for enemies: the Gauls were closing in up them on every side† (Pg. 158). As the Romans became overwhelmed they came back down the southern hillside, the Gauls followed blindly, as the Gauls were struck by left and right flanks of Caesars [7]10th legion. The battle on the hill was devastating on sides, 46 centurions and approximately 700 legionnaire’s dead and thousands wounded. Caesar disbanded the siege and tried to return to Rome to regroup and gather supplies and men. After the Gergovia the people of Gaul still had their faith in Vercingetorix, he was re-elected Commander and Chief. Caesar is further planning his campaign decided to enlist a large number of German cavalry to his assortment. During the entire Gallic Wars, Caesar has been outnumbered almost 3 to 1 and sometimes 4 to 1 odds, but Caesars strategy is what has been proving key in battles; the quality of men over numbers. As Caesar marches toward the provinces, Vercingetorix in a sudden ignorant act of boldness ascends his infantry and small cavalry head on attacking Caesars Roman legions. Caesar staying calm, â€Å"He sent his cavalry, in three divisions, to repel the triple attack† (Pg. 168). The Gauls retreated to Alesia with Caesars legions following close behind night and day. As the Romans reach Alesia Caesar informs his men that this battle will be a, â€Å"toilsome effort† (Pg. 170). Caesar realized that Alesia could only be taken by what he called, â€Å"a line of investment, fully nine miles in length, along which a ring of camps was constructed† (Pg. 70), this was a series of circumvallations: trenches, ramparts, entrenchments, and barriers built around Alesia with cavalry on low ground and legion infantry on high slopes. The Romans being few in number did not have enough men or cavalry to guard the surrounding blockade of Alesia. Vercingetorix realizing that he was bei ng closed in with four Roman legions linking up with Caesars six legions, Vercingetorix had to get help somehow. Under the cover of darkness Vercingetorix sent out Gauls to every region and, â€Å"bring back with them every man who could wield a sword† (Pg. 171). He also reminded them not to abandon the Gallic cause. Caesar had been given news of Vercingetorix call for relief armies, by group of deserters. Caesar understood that he too was surrounded by all of Gaul, but it was still uncertain whether the relief armies would show up for Vercingetorix. Unlike the Romans who had proven loyalty and precision in battle, the Gauls even though united, were still undisciplined and lacked the skill of a Roman legionnaire. Caesar seeing the potential threat from the surrounding mountains proceeded to build entrenchments and barriers to his rear and on the western slope of Alesia where an open meadow was located. Caesars men made haste with the construction of barriers and traps like, â€Å"five rows of strong boughs were fixed in each, with one end protruding above ground, sharpened and with the branches projecting so as to form a kind of [8]abatis† (Pg. 139/Part I). Caesar also had traps under the ground surface, â€Å"In front of them and rising a few inches above the ground, but purposely concealed by brushwood, were sharp pointed logs embedded in small pits† (Pg. 139/Part I), as there were also barbed spikes lying under the turf. Caesar moved quickly to gather as much corn and resources as he could, knowing that this battle may very well be the last. Meanwhile inside the wall of Alesia Vercingetorix had the grain thrown into a single stock; as the grain would be dispersed among the soldiers rather than the citizens. A council of Gallic Chieftains gathered at an assembly to discuss Vercingetorix situation in Alesia and how he had requested a, â€Å"universal levy† (Pg. 173), or a mass of armies combined. It was heavily debated because many tribes were at conflict with Germanic tribes or resolving domestic problems; some simply refused to send any army. In all about 43 tribes joined in with a massive cavalry as well. Four generals were given command of the 250,000 Gauls as it was said there was, â€Å"No one leader of sufficient eminence to command universal respect† (Pg. 174), this would be proven decisively. As the relief army of Gaul marched towards Alesia, days away, the city was going into famine. The chieftains proposed the method of cannibalism as said, â€Å"That their fathers, when driven into the fastnesses by the Cimbri and Teutoni, had sustained life by feeding upon the flesh of those who were useless for warfare† (Pg. 175). It was rather decided that the weak, young, and old were citizens of the town, were to be exiled. The hopeless looking women and children, and elderly came down to the Roman blockade. Caesars blockade forbid no-one to pass through; the exiled inhabitants were not taken in, instead Caesar had them sent back or stay between the lines of the wall and blockade to perish. The relief army soon arrives passing through the mountain valley, they could be seen from miles away as a mass of cavalry and infantry. Commius leading the Gallic mass launched a cavalry assault on Caesars rear defenses as Vercingetorix attacked from the inner defenses from [9]Alesia. The Roman legions held strong repelling the Gallic cavalry with Caesars brilliant defensive military strategy. The Romans formed a compact body of infantry and split the Gallic cavalry’s onslaught into disarray. The one major advantage the Caesar had over all the Gauls it was the reliable communication he had with his commanders of his legions. The Romans were on point and deadly, as the first day was won by Caesar. A 24 hour period of cease fire took place, and this time under the cover of darkness the Gauls launched a surprise attack on the Roman blockade using loud shouts to alert the rest of the Gallic army. The Gauls attempted to siege the blockade walls with grappling-hooks and ladders they attempted to overpower the blockades. In between the defensive lines the Gauls were dismembered by the wooden spikes and traps placed along the lines. Two sections of the Gallic army failed to cooperate with the rest of the mass due to poor [10]communication during the night. Roman artillery took apart the Gauls in between the defenses as casualties mounted because of poor effectiveness during the night raid. The Gauls retreated before dawn, fearing a flank from the right. Vercingetorix and Caesar refused to give into each other with casualties piling up on both parties, neither side budged. The soldiers of both sides were describes as they fought, â€Å"Every man fought like a hero; for they knew that from the heights around friends and enemies alike were anxiously watching† (Pg. 176). Vercingetorix and the Gauls planned for a final assault on the Romans. Vercingetorix discovered a weak spot in the Roman blockade where Caesars men were unable to build a barrier. The Gauls with no delay assaulted the weak point with 60,000 Gallic warriors against only two legions. The Romans became heavily overwhelmed and in disarray with 60,000 Gauls attacking from the rear and Vercingetorix army attacking from the inner walls. The Romans in panic and disorganization were described as, â€Å"painfully distracted by the roar of battle in their rear; for both on the inner and the outer line men felt, as they fought, that they would perish if their comrades behind suffered the enemy to break through† (Pg. 178). It was difficult for the Roman legions to mass together due to the overwhelming Gallic numbers. Vercassivellaunus, commanding the 60,000 Gauls from the rear; continually sent fresh infantry in. The Gallic infantry was disposable due the sheer numbers. Caesar seeing the disarray of the Romans and his cavalry sent Labienus with six cohorts to hold their ground till they were forced to fight in open ground. In astonishing fashion Caesar mounting horseback went down the Roman line as it was depicted, â€Å"riding down between the lines on to the plain, he harangued his weary soldiers and adjured them not to give in† (Pg. 179), continuing he said, â€Å"Just one short hour, and the prize was won† (Pg. 179). It was not until Caesar himself on horseback galloped steadfast, leading the last head on assault. A new found zealous came over the Roman legions as they followed behind Caesar, they disbanded the Gauls in a mass, scattering across the land. The Gauls to appease the Romans would have Vercingetorix give himself up and die. Vercingetorix gave himself up willingly out of respect for Caesar, being an admirer of his military brilliance. It was said that Vercingetorix, â€Å"took off his armour, laid down his sword, and bowed himself at Caesar’s feet† (Pg. 180). Caesar had no admiration for Vercingetorix as it came with a great cost. Caesar had him imprisoned in a dungeon, and then executed six ears later. The conquering of Gaul propelled Caesars political power tremendously. In 49 B. C he was elected dictator or emperor of Rome and soon after Civil war broke out eventually leading to Caesars killing. Caesar outwitted the ambitious and powerful, yet inexperienced Vercingetorix profoundly in the battles of Avaricum, Gergovia, and Alesia. Caesar conquered Gaul in such extra ordinary fashion, that it still leaves some historians in amazement. Caesar outmaneuvered a quarter million Gauls and strategically dismantling them. Caesars reasoning for this long and grueling conquest of Gaul was to dig himself and Rome out of the debt that had amounted. His conquest of Gaul was also an attempt, a successful one at that, to further his political career and bolster his power. His victory in Rome, as said before, put Caesar on a pedestal surpassing Pompey and Crassus and making him the favorite amongst Roman people. Works Cited Holmes, Thomas. Caesar’s conquest of Gaul. 1899. Print. . Julius, Caesar, W. A. McDevitte , and W. S. Bohn. The Gallic Wars . 1st. Print. . Julius, Caesar, W. A. McDevitte , and W. S. Bohn. The Gallic Wars . 3rd. Print. . Julius, Caesar, W. A. McDevitte , and W. S. Bohn. The Gallic Wars . 4th. Print. . Julius, Caesar, W. A. McDevitte , and W. S. Bohn. The Gallic Wars . 8th. Print. . Holmes, Thomas. Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul:An Historical Narrative (being Part I of the Larger Work on the Same Subject). Part 1. Macmillan, ———————– [1] The First Triumvirate was between the Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey. An alliance to help bolster power for Caesar in particular. [2] Equanimity†¦one of Caesars great attributes being that he was very calm and poised in battle. 3] Phalanxes was a battle formation with consisted of shields and spears. The Romans used it very effectively against all. [pic] [4] The Cevennes Mountains are in south-central France. It is known as Hidden France by some. [5] Cenabum’s massacre was Caesars attempt at revenge as the town was pillaged. [6] The massacres of Cenabum and Avaricum spec ifically, was because of the difficulty Caesar had sieging the towns, thus frustration led to the killings. [7] The Roman 10th Legion was known as the Legio X Equestris and was one of Caesar more famous legions. 8] Abatis were used as barriers; they had long sharpened pointed logs. [9] â€Å"According to Napolean I (Precis des guerres de Cesar, 1836, p. 110), more than fifty days must have elapsed between the departure of Vercingetorix’s cavalry and the arrival of the relieving army† (Pg. 175) [10] Gaul having 4 commanding armies that totaled in a quarter million men made it Qy ‘ »LiAOUaaaA ? â„ ¢  ¶ ? n w ? o? UO? UAU »Ã‚ ±Ã‚ §? â€Å"†°Ã¢â‚¬Å"oA|o_oRoRERhw? h42aCJ^JaJhw? h. â€Å"CJ^JaJjhyg? 0Jhw? h ®w†ºCJ^JaJhw? ho  CJ^extremely difficult for Vercingetorix to communicate successfully outside the walls. How to cite Caesars Gallic Wars, Essay examples

La Dulzura Engaosa Del Amor Essays - Corazn En Condominio

La dulzura enga?osa del Amor Luis de G?ngora, uno de los m?s bien conocidos poetas del siglo Barroco en Espa?a, es poeta cuyo poes?a es lleno de color en la forma de figuras ret?ricas y tropos. La dulce boca es una tal obra. G?ngora escribe este poema en el g?nero del soneto, en su forma de catorce versos (dos cuartetos y dos tercetos) de once s?labas (a veces usando las sinalefas para obtenerlo). Su rima es consonancia, escrita ABBA ABBA CDE DCE: las A siendo convida, Ida, vida, y escondida; las B destilado, sagrado, colorado, armado; las C Aurora y ahora; las D olorosas y rosas; y porfin, las E seno y veneno. Pero debajo estes t?cnicos, hay la mensaje que el Amor no es algo que satisfecha, sino que causa la pena. Hay muchas figuras ret?ricas en esta obra. El Amor, el sujeto, tambi?n es el centro de las figuras ret?ricas. A trav?s del poema, el Amor existe en varias met?foras, las cuales son el sierpe, las rosas, las manzanas, y lo primero, la dulce boca. Estas met?foras que respresentan el Amor son, en muchos casos, met?foras de dos niveles. El t?tulo del poema La dulce boca, mientras sea una sinestesia, tambi?n es una metonimia, usando la boca, s?lo poco parte del Amor, para simbolizarlo como todo el Amor. Pero adem?s, es una prosopopeya, implicando que la dulce boca, por la raz?n de tener humor, tiene vida. (El humor, por una de sus varias definiciones, puede ser la sustancia emitida de algo con vida). En el poema, este humor es algo tan precioso que es destilado, o purificado, entre perlas, las cuales mismas tienen mucho valor. Se sugiere que el humor sea mejor que, sin comparaci?n, a aquel licor sagrado. Esto se enfatice en la alusi?n a la historia romana de el garz?n de Ida, el muchacho robado por el dios J?piter, debido a su belleza, para le ser a J?piter ?l que trae la copa llena del n?ctar de los dioses. Por eso, la dulce boca otra vez se personifica, convidando creer quienquiera que contiene algo que vale m?s que el n?ctar de los dioses, aun el licor sagrado, tra?do a J?piter, el dios m?s poderoso, por uno de lo s mortales m?s perfecto. En la segunda estrofa, el sierpe es otra met?fora para el Amor. Se sugiere que el Amor sea peligroso, m?s indicado por el hecho que el serpiente se esconde entre las flores. Causa el sentido que nadie sepa los peligros desconocidos que existen con cosas tan inocentes como flores, y advisa que tenga cuidado, como nunca se puede sabido de d?nde se esconden los malos. El ap?strofe, amantes, no toqu?is, si quer?is vida, implica la fatalidad del Amor, y luego explicarlo por comparar un labio y otro colorado a flor y flor, entre lo cual esconde un serpiente. Un muerde del sierpe causar? la muerte. El Amor, aunque parece bueno, con sus flores colorados, contiene muchos malos, y es mejor que no acercar, para que no sea mordido por el sierpe. Se advisa en la tercera estrofa que no se enga?e por las rosas que a la Aurora dir?is que...se le cayeron del purp?reo seno. La Aurora es met?fora de dos niveles. Por un lado, la Aurora quiere decir lo obvio: la aurora, o el amanecer, y el purp?reo seno refiere al color cuando se amanece. En otro nivel, la Aurora alude a Aurora, la diosa romana del amanecer. Era infame por sus amor?os, sacando hombres guapos para ser sus amantes. Ella se enamor? con Tithonus, con qui?n ten?a hijo, Memnon. Cuando fue matado Memnon, Aurora rez? al J?piter, para que no le perdiera a Tithonus a la muerte, pero se le olvid? pedir que ?l le quedara la salud. Al fin, ?l, aunque inmortal, consigui? ponerse viejo y con el tiempo, se marcit? y convirti? en nada, y se le qued? a Aurora s?lo la memor?a de los dos que amaba. Los griegos, que tambi?n ten?an su versi?n de Aurora, cre?an que los alj?fares fueron las l?grimas que llor? ella por Memnon. Las rosas describidas como aljorafadas pueden querer decir algo a gradable, pero en esta vista, sugiere cosas m?s dolorosas. G?ngora usa esta alusi?n para mostrar qu? tr?gico puede ser el